It's a common misconception that Judeo-Christianity promotes a male-dominated society where women are oppressed. Probably the most frequently quoted verses (out of context) which supports this idea is Ephesians 5:22 "Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord." Now, I personally feel that both sides (the secular world, and many Christian communities) take this verse to the extreme, and misinterpret it into something it's not. At first glance, it really does sound like Paul is telling women to be subservient to men; that we're just supposed to turn our brains off and do whatever men tell us. The command here is much deeper and complicated than that. When we look at the word 'submission' throughout the Bible (see 1 Chronicles 29:24, Hebrews 5:7. 1 Peter 3:22), we don't see blind obedience like a slave to a master. Rather, the word 'submission' is more akin to a respect for an authority. Basically, God calls men to be leaders, and women to allow them to fill that role. Partnerships usually function the best when there are separate roles to be filled, and marriages can avoid a lot of conflict if there are already established positions. This does not mean that the wife is subservient, voiceless, or intentionally kept weak and ignorant. Keep in mind that three verses later, Paul commands husbands to love their wives as Christ loves the church. Considering the fact that Christ gave his life up for the church, it's hard to argue that these roles aren't fair. Women, respect your husbands, men, love your wives. It's simple, and it's not misogynistic at all. Men may be the leaders, but there are checks and balances that allow equality in marriage relationships.
The story of Deborah is surprisingly applicable to the 21st century. The women in Judges 4 are both Biblical heroes, yet they stand outside that stereotypical submissive housewife model which so many of us mistake for the ideal Christian woman. If you're not familiar with the story, Israel has once again "done evil in the sight of the Lord" and God has allowed them to be conquered by the Canaanites. Deborah, the wife of Lappidoth (who isn't really talked about all that much, except for his relationship to Deborah), is judging Israel at the time. She's both a prophetess and wife...that should stand out to us. This little detail alone lets us know that it's perfectly fine for a Christian women to have both a career and a husband. And it's definitely not Lappidoth who is judging Israel, with Deborah at his side. Deborah is her own thing. Anyways, God reveals to Deborah how to defeat the Canaanite army, so she summons a man named Barak to lead Israel into battle. Deborah probably could've rallied the army herself, but she allows this leadership role to go to a man. His response? He's too afraid to go by himself, so he asks Deborah to come with him. When we have questions about gender-roles in Judeo-Christianity, we need look no further than Judges 4:9 for clarity.
"'Certainly I will go with you,' said Deborah. 'But because of the course you are taking, the honor will not be yours, for the Lord will deliver Sisera into the hands of a woman.' So Deborah went with Barak to Kedesh."
Deborah isn't wrong for stepping outside of her usual role and becoming a leader. She only does so because the man whose job it was to be a leader turned out to be a coward. There's no shame on Deborah, only dishonor on Barak. She stepped down and allowed a man to fulfill a leadership role. Barak is given an amazing opportunity to become one of the great heroes of the Bible, but he robs himself of that honor because of his cowardice. Deborah didn't want to have to lead Israel to victory over the Canaanites, but because Barak failed to man-up, women had to pick up the slack.
The story ends with Sisera, commander of the Canaanite army, running into the wilderness and finding refuge with the wife of a Canaanite ally, Jael. Jael cares for Sisera, gives him food and promises to protect him. Then, when Sisera falls asleep, Jael drives a tent peg into his temples and kills him. Barak arrives late to the scene, only to discover that the man he was pursuing has already been killed...by a woman.
Here's how I see this story in terms of how we're supposed to live as Christians today: God made men and women with certain differences so that they could fill different roles. Men are supposed to be the leaders, the go-getters, the heads of families. Women should be content to play supporting roles. It's not subservience, it's just that there are different parts to play. You can't play football without an offense and a defense. BUT the modern world is full of men like Barak who are too weak and cowardly to be the leaders we need. Women shouldn't be expected to submit to men who aren't hard-working or courageous. When men fail to grow up into leaders and providers, (due to cowardice, or being too sheltered, or the desire not to leave the comfort of prolonged adolescence,) women are not in the wrong for stepping up in their place.
I don't like modern-day feminism. I think that what started out as a great movement has been perverted over the years into an irrational hate-fest. There are feminists who argue that women should be able to wear whatever they want, only to insist five seconds later that showing bikini-clad women on TV is sexism. There are feminists who will be complain that there are not enough female-characters in the media, but then will rant about how the Disney princesses negatively impact young girls. So to make one thing clear, I am not one of these women. I don't think women are better than men, I don't hate men, and I don't think men are incapable. On the contrary, I think men and masculinity are awesome. They are supposed to be leaders, warriors, and providers because that's how they were designed. I don't do hate men, I just wish the men of my generation were stronger and well...manlier. For whatever reason (be it video games, coddling, radical feminists shoving men out of their way, etc.,) boys aren't growing up into men. One of the biggest reasons that Christian women are confused about their roles is because men are confused about theirs.
Women, you shouldn't settle down with a man who is weaker than you. If you choose to submit to him, you'll be limiting your own strength and capabilities, and if you choose to lead then both of you are missing out on God's ideal picture of marriage. Men, don't take a wife until you are mentally, emotionally, and financially able to provide for a wife. Too often I've seen Christian couples rush into marriage, and it's the woman who ends up becoming the provider. Or, rather than getting their own place, the couple moves into one of their parents' homes because neither of them are financially ready to be independent. I'm sorry, but that's disgusting. I can't wrap my mind around asking a girl to marry you, and rather than taking the financial burden off of her and her family, you simply move in with her make her family provide for you too. It's one of the most selfish and immature things that a man can do, and I've seen numerous examples of it. In fact, I know more young Christian couples who have started off their marriages this way than those who have actually flown the nest. Before we accept this behavior as just a "sign of our economic times," let me point to 1 Timothy 5:8: "Anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever." The Bible calls men to be providers so that women can fulfill their separate role. When men fail to be those providers, it's not the fault of women. I've heard people blame feminism for the death of chivalry. I believe there should be no excuses. When women save the day, they should not be criticized for doing man's work. Men need to be men, so that women are free to be women.
Those who know me know that I'm a pretty strong woman. I work and study hard because I want to have a good career someday. I'd like to be a writer or a teacher or both. But sometimes I really wish that I wasn't so afraid for my future. Growing up, I always pictured myself working a job on the side, while my husband provided the majority of our income so that I could be a mom. Now I find myself surrounded by men who mooch off of their career-driven wives and girlfriends, and fear that a husband might actually be more of a burden than a help. Now don't get me wrong, I know that there are good Christian men out there who are hard-working and self-sacrificing, like the men Paul describes in Ephesians 5. These are the guys we women should wait for, and make our leaders. I would be willing to submit to someone with that kind of work ethic and maturity. But am I going to sit around waiting for some sleazy wimp to marry me and move into my parents' house? Um, no thanks. I'll rally the Israelites myself, thank you.